TARGET Jean-Baptiste (1733-1806) avocat et homme politique. - Lot 808

Lot n° 808
Go to lot
Estimation :
400 - 500 EUR
TARGET Jean-Baptiste (1733-1806) avocat et homme politique. - Lot 808
TARGET Jean-Baptiste (1733-1806) avocat et homme politique. L.A.S. "Target", July 28, 1769, [to Charles-Joseph NATOIRE?]; 2 pages in-4. About the trial of the architect Mouton against the painter Natoire. [Charles-Joseph NATOIRE (1700-1777), director of the Académie de France in Rome, had chased away the architect Adrien MOUTON (1741-1820) who had refused to present the director with a confession note for Easter; Mouton won his trial in 1770, Natoire being sentenced to 20,000 livres in damages and costs]. He sent a memorandum: "It is only a question of repairing the honor of the young man who was hunted, & slandered. He has asked for reparations, & damages, & interest, if we settle, he does not want any more money, except for his expenses; he is only asking for something public, which announces the error of which he was the victim "... We attach this handwritten memorandum, December 17, 1768 (6 p. in-4), setting out the case in detail; Natoire's duty was to watch over the morals of the students, but he was not only to be condemned for having exceeded his authority, but also for having wanted to "subject some Francois to Roman practices. The Francois who remain in Rome under the protection of the King must live there according to our maxims... An L.A.S. by François-Denis TRONCHET (1726-1806, lawyer, defender of Louis XVI), Paris February 10 [for March 1785, to Jean-Baptiste TARGET] is attached (1 p. in-4, address). On the reception of TARGET at the French Academy (March 10, 1785) Tronchet still congratulates him, but makes however an observation on the sentence of his speech relating to the eloquence among the Athenians: "You said that the eloquence which maintains the energy of the nation is preferable to public tranquility. This idea, taken as a general principle, can be considered false, and even more so as dangerous".... Then he makes another remark on the answer of Mr. de NIVERNOIS which might not please some of their fellow lawyers...
My orders
Sale information
Sales conditions
Return to catalogue